information that banks’ intentions to increase mexico telegram data their loan portfolios for the next year have been revised downwards significantly.
After the decision to keep the rate at 21%, some experts said that the regulator had switched from a “complete and uncompromising” fight against inflation to a more flexible and balanced approach to controlling inflation. Is this true, is this judgment correct? Have you somehow revised your approach to bringing inflation to the target? Perhaps you have now decided not to return it to the target so quickly, this process has stretched out over time, has become slower?
There has been no abandonment of the uncompromising
fight against inflation. Inflation at the target is our top priority, we have not abandoned it and will not abandon it. At the same time, it is not only the inflation at the moment that is important, but also what will happen to it in the future. The Central Bank’s decision affects economic processes.
including inflation with lags and it is important
for us to understand how the decisions already made these sources include smart sensors and surveillance cameras will affect the future price dynamics. We have seen that at present factors have emerged, including those independent of the monetary policy, which can significantly slow down the inflationary trends that exist now.
—That’s why you paid more attention america email to these autonomous factors in your press release…